It’s a simple tale, and it seems to be aimed mainly at younger girls, although that doesn’t exclude younger boys (many of whom, untainted by society’s expectations, are quite happy to like pink and identify with female characters). The illustrations are by the author’s own children, which is sweet.
The explanations are simple – “[The doctor] told her that her brain was not working as it should, but he could give her some medicine to make her feel better” – and the drugs do, apparently, work, although they still leave Princess Parkinsonia (who is a mummy) shaking a bit, walking funny and unable to “do things as she did before…”
But everybody loves her, and love is all-conquering in fairy tales, so there is a happy ending even though she doesn’t get better (after all, how could she?).
I’m a bit ambivalent about this book. I’m trying really hard not to be annoyed by the occasional grammatical slip or that rather pointless collection of stray exclamation marks on page 9. So, ignoring that, and thinking only about the story, I find it insubstantial but appealing. My daughter loves it, and my son (who is 7) seems rather fond, too. I think that it does a good job of targeting the younger age group, and it isn’t sad and depressing. It refers to a parent – specifically a mother – with Parkinson’s, and it doesn’t feel like a rewrite of a book about a grandparent (because, of course, it isn’t). It mentions diagnosis, and expresses how shocking that can be (that’s where those exclamation marks were), and it refers exclusively (albeit obliquely) to the early stages of Parkinson’s. Which is fine, because children are not that young for very long, and their parent is unlikely to have progressed significantly during the time that they are so very young.
“The Tale of a Parkie Princess” is a good book for younger children whose parents are affected by Parkinson’s , but I don’t consider it to be essential.